Analysis of one-year follow-up results and treatment costs of patients with PTE in a tertiary care center.

Introduction: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a life-threatening disease, with substantial treatment-related complications, difficult follow-up, treatment compliance, and high costs. This study aimed to assess treatment costs with various maintenance therapy regimens, complications, and patient adherence to treatment over a one-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: This observational, prospective study included 142 patients with PTE who received maintenance anticoagulation therapy between November 2020 and March 2023. The patients were observed at three-month intervals for a year. Possible treatment-related complications, recurrence, mortality, and treatment costs were recorded. Result: Our results showed that there was no significant difference in bleeding risk based on the drugs used for initial or maintenance treatment. In maintenance therapy, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment regimens had similar treatment adherence and comparable efficacy and safety in terms of recurrence and bleeding (p> 0.05). Four patients (2.8%) were diagnosed with chronic thromboembolic disease. The one-year mortality rate was 24.6% (n= 35), of which 82.9% (n= 29) occurred within the first three months. Hospital mortality rates with the different maintenance therapies were 8.8% in the LMWH group, 5.7% in the warfarin group, and 3.2% in the DOAC group. The annual cost of using LMWH was higher than that of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and warfarin (p< 0.001) while there was no significant cost difference between DOACs and warfarin (p> 0.05). Conclusions: In our study, the LMWH, warfarin, and DOAC treatment regimens had similar efficacy, safety, and patient compliance. In terms of cost, LMWH was the costliest while DOAC and warfarin were similar.

Comparison of two antifibrotic treatments for lung fibrosis in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized, prospective study.

Background: Although pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 infection is uncommon, it can lead to problems if not treated effectively in the early period. This study aimed to compare the effects of treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in patients with COVID-19-related fibrosis. Methods: Thirty patients who presented to the post-COVID outpatient clinic between May 2021 and April 2022 with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and exhibited persistent cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and low oxygen saturation at least 12 weeks after diagnosis were included. The patients were randomized to receive off-label treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone and were followed up for 12 weeks. Results: After 12 weeks of treatment, all pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, 6MWT distance, and oxygen saturation were increased compared to baseline in both the pirfenidone group and nintedanib groups, while heart rate and radiological score levels were decreased (p < 0.05 for all). The changes in 6MWT distance and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (p = 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Adverse drug effects were more frequent with nintedanib than pirfenidone, with the most common being diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Conclusion: In patients with interstitial fibrosis after COVID-19 pneumonia, both nintedanib and pirfenidone were observed to be effective in improving radiological score and PFT parameters. Nintedanib was more effective than pirfenidone in increasing exercise capacity and saturation values but caused more adverse drug effects.

Introducción: Aunque la fibrosis pulmonar secundaria a la infección por COVID-19 es poco común, puede generar problemas si no se trata de manera efectiva en el período inicial. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar los efectos del tratamiento con nintedanib y pirfenidona en pacientes con fibrosis relacionada con COVID-19. Métodos: Se incluyeron 30 pacientes que acudieron a la consulta externa post-COVID entre mayo de 2021 y abril de 2022 con antecedentes de neumonía por COVID-19 y presentaron tos persistente, disnea, disnea de esfuerzo y baja saturación de oxígeno al menos 12 semanas después del diagnóstico. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir un tratamiento no aprobado con nintedanib o pirfenidona y fueron seguidos durante 12 semanas. Resultados: Después de 12 semanas de tratamiento, todos los parámetros de la prueba de función pulmonar (PFT), la distancia de la PM6M y la saturación de oxígeno aumentaron en comparación con los valores basales tanto en el grupo de pirfenidona como en el de nintedanib, mientras que la frecuencia cardíaca y los niveles de puntuación radiológica disminuyeron (p < 0,05 para todos). Los cambios en la distancia de la PM6M y la saturación de oxígeno fueron significativamente mayores en el grupo de nintedanib que en el grupo de pirfenidona (p = 0,02 y p = 0,005, respectivamente). Los efectos adversos del fármaco fueron más frecuentes con nintedanib que con pirfenidona, siendo los más comunes diarrea, náuseas y vómitos. Conclusión: En pacientes con fibrosis intersticial después de neumonía por COVID-19 se observó que tanto nintedanib como pirfenidona son efectivos para mejorar la puntuación radiológica y los parámetros de la PFT. Nintedanib fue más eficaz que pirfenidona para aumentar la capacidad de ejercicio y los valores de saturación, pero provocó más efectos adversos del fármaco.

Comparison of two antifibrotic treatments for lung fibrosis in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized, prospective study / Comparación de dos tratamientos antifibróticos para la fibrosis pulmonar en el síndrome post-COVID-19: un estudio prospectivo aleatorizado

Background Although pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 infection is uncommon, it can lead to problems if not treated effectively in the early period. This study aimed to compare the effects of treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in patients with COVID-19-related fibrosis. Methods Thirty patients who presented to the post-COVID outpatient clinic between May 2021 and April 2022 with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and exhibited persistent cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and low oxygen saturation at least 12 weeks after diagnosis were included. The patients were randomized to receive off-label treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone and were followed up for 12 weeks. Results After 12 weeks of treatment, all pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, 6MWT distance, and oxygen saturation were increased compared to baseline in both the pirfenidone group and nintedanib groups, while heart rate and radiological score levels were decreased (p<0.05 for all). The changes in 6MWT distance and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (p=0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Adverse drug effects were more frequent with nintedanib than pirfenidone, with the most common being diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Conclusion In patients with interstitial fibrosis after COVID-19 pneumonia, both nintedanib and pirfenidone were observed to be effective in improving radiological score and PFT parameters. Nintedanib was more effective than pirfenidone in increasing exercise capacity and saturation values but caused more adverse drug effects (AU)

Introducción Aunque la fibrosis pulmonar secundaria a la infección por COVID-19 es poco común, puede generar problemas si no se trata de manera efectiva en el período inicial. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar los efectos del tratamiento con nintedanib y pirfenidona en pacientes con fibrosis relacionada con COVID-19. Métodos Se incluyeron 30 pacientes que acudieron a la consulta externa post-COVID entre mayo de 2021 y abril de 2022 con antecedentes de neumonía por COVID-19 y presentaron tos persistente, disnea, disnea de esfuerzo y baja saturación de oxígeno al menos 12semanas después del diagnóstico. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir un tratamiento no aprobado con nintedanib o pirfenidona y fueron seguidos durante 12semanas. Resultados Después de 12semanas de tratamiento, todos los parámetros de la prueba de función pulmonar (PFT), la distancia de la PM6M y la saturación de oxígeno aumentaron en comparación con los valores basales tanto en el grupo de pirfenidona como en el de nintedanib, mientras que la frecuencia cardíaca y los niveles de puntuación radiológica disminuyeron (p<0,05 para todos). Los cambios en la distancia de la PM6M y la saturación de oxígeno fueron significativamente mayores en el grupo de nintedanib que en el grupo de pirfenidona (p=0,02 y p=0,005, respectivamente). Los efectos adversos del fármaco fueron más frecuentes con nintedanib que con pirfenidona, siendo los más comunes diarrea, náuseas y vómitos. Conclusión En pacientes con fibrosis intersticial después de neumonía por COVID-19 se observó que tanto nintedanib como pirfenidona son efectivos para mejorar la puntuación radiológica y los parámetros de la PFT. Nintedanib fue más eficaz que pirfenidona para aumentar la capacidad de ejercicio y los valores de saturación, pero provocó más efectos adversos del fármaco (AU)

Comparison of two antifibrotic treatments for lung fibrosis in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 infection is uncommon, it can lead to problems if not treated effectively in the early period. This study aimed to compare the effects of treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in patients with COVID-19-related fibrosis. METHODS: Thirty patients who presented to the post-COVID outpatient clinic between May 2021 and April 2022 with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and exhibited persistent cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and low oxygen saturation at least 12 weeks after diagnosis were included. The patients were randomized to receive off-label treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone and were followed up for 12 weeks. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, all pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, 6MWT distance, and oxygen saturation were increased compared to baseline in both the pirfenidone group and nintedanib groups, while heart rate and radiological score levels were decreased (p<0.05 for all). The changes in 6MWT distance and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (p=0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Adverse drug effects were more frequent with nintedanib than pirfenidone, with the most common being diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: In patients with interstitial fibrosis after COVID-19 pneumonia, both nintedanib and pirfenidone were observed to be effective in improving radiological score and PFT parameters. Nintedanib was more effective than pirfenidone in increasing exercise capacity and saturation values but caused more adverse drug effects.

Determination and pharmacokinetic study of riociguat by UPLC-MS/MS in human plasma.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is frequent in the general population and is linked to an increased risk of death. Riociguat is a kind of endothelin receptor antagonist that is often used to treat PH. For pharmacokinetic studies and the determination of riociguat in PH patients, a new, quick, easy, and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS approach was designed and validated. Riociguat and irbesartan (IS) were detected using ESI in positive ion and multiple reaction monitoring mode, respectively, by monitoring the mass transitions m/z 423.0 â†’ 391.0 and 429.1 â†’ 206.9. A reverse-phase C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm) was used with an isocratic mobile phase of water containing 0.1 % formic acid-acetonitrile (25:75, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min for chromatographic separation. In the range of 5-400 ng/ml, the calibration curve was linear and had a good correlation coefficient (0.9972). This is the first UPLC-MS/MS technique that has been developed and validated for determining riociguat from human plasma. The developed analytical method was extensively validated for linearity, selectivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, stability, matrix effect and recovery, according to FDA criteria. The devised approach was successfully used for a pharmacokinetic research and riociguat determination in PH patients.

When and how important is anti-fibrotic therapy in the post-COVID-19 period?

PURPOSE: In addition to the highly variable clinical presentation of acute COVID-19 infection, it can also cause various post-acute signs and symptoms. In our study, we aimed to examine the efficacy of anti-fibrotic therapy in patients who developed pulmonary fibrosis after COVID-19. METHODS: In total, 15 patients who applied to the Post-Covid Outpatient Clinic between May 2021 and August 2021 and were diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia, and whose cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea and low saturation continued to be present at least 12 weeks after the diagnosis, were included in the study. Off-label pirfenidone treatment was started according to the radiological findings, pulmonary function test parameters (PFT) and 6-minute walking test (6MWT) results. The patients were followed up for 12 weeks. RESULTS: While all of the FVC, FVC%, FEV1, FEV1%, DLCO%, DLCO/VA%, 6MWT, and room air saturation levels were observed to increase statistically significantly in the patients at the 12th week, it was determined that there was a statistically significant decrease in the pulse level in room air (p = 0.01, 0.01, 0.01, 0.01, 0.004, 0.001, 0.002, 0.001, and 0.002, respectively). In regression analysis based on radiological scoring, it was observed that the DLCO and room air saturation levels at the 12th week of the treatment were statistically significantly higher in patients with lower scores at the beginning (p = 0.04, 0.03). In addition, it was observed that anti-fibrotic treatment, which was started in the earliest period, i.e., 12 weeks after the diagnosis, resulted in an improvement in radiological, PFT and 6MWT parameters. CONCLUSION: Patients who still had dyspnea and low saturation 12 weeks after the diagnosis, defined as chronic COVID-19, should be evaluated for anti-fibrotic therapy after the necessary radiological and PFT evaluation. Early treatment commencement brings about, besides radiological improvement, a better response obtained in PFT and 6MWT (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 21).

Investigation of the need for computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the decision to discontinue treatment for pulmonary thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality that can reduce quality of life due to long-term complications during and after treatment discontinuation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients for these complications before discontinuing treatment and determine the necessity of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included 116 patients over the age of 18 who received anticoagulant treatment for at least 3 months and presented for treatment discontinuation to the Atatürk University Research Hospital Chest Diseases Outpatient Clinic between January 2015 and September 2019. RESULTS: CTPA performed at treatment discontinuation showed complete thrombus resolution with treatment in 73 patients (62.9%). High pulmonary artery obstruction index (PAOI) at diagnosis was statistically associated with findings of residual or chronic thrombus on CTPA at treatment discontinuation (p = 0.001). In the differentiation of patients with residual/chronic thrombus and those with thrombus resolution, D-dimer at a cut-off value of 474 µg/L had 60% sensitivity and 70% specificity. At a cut-off value of 35.5 mmHg, mean pulmonary artery pressure on echocardiography had sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 77%, respectively. At a cut-off of 23.75, PAOI had sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In addition to physical examination findings, D-dimer and echocardiography were guiding parameters in the evaluation of treatment discontinuation and thrombus resolution in patients presenting to the outpatient clinic for discontinuation of treatment for acute PTE. PAOI at diagnosis may be another important guiding parameter in addition to these examinations.

The role of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in the evaluation of lung parenchymal involvement in COVID-19 patients.

The inflammatory balance is an important factor in the clinical course of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which has affected over 300 million people globally since its appearance in December 2019. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level and parenchymal involvement in COVID-19. The study included 106 patients with the delta variant of COVID-19 identified by real-time PCR as well as 40 healthy control groups between October 2021 and March 2022. The patients were analyzed in three groups: moderate COVID-19 (group 1), severe COVID-19 without macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) (group 2), and severe COVID-19 with MAS (group 3). FeNO and CT scores were significantly higher in groups 2 and 3 at admission and discharge compared to group 1 (p = 0.001 for all). In addition, CT score at admission and CT score and FeNO level at discharge were higher in group 3 than in group 2 (p = 0.001 for all). It was found that the FeNO levels were higher in Groups 2 and 3 than in the control group (p = 0.001) during the admission. FeNO and CT scores showed strong positive correlation at admission and discharge (r = 0.917, p = 0.001; r = 0.790, p = 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for prediction of MAS, FeNO at a cut-off of 10.5 ppb had 66% sensitivity and 71% specificity. COVID-19 causes more severe lung involvement than other viral lower respiratory tract infections, leading to the frequent use of chest CT in these patients. FeNO assessment is a practical and noninvasive method that may be useful in evaluating for parenchymal infiltration in the diagnosis and follow-up of COVID-19 patients.

Evaluation of 3-month follow-up of patients with postacute COVID-19 syndrome.

In addition to the highly variable clinical presentation of acute COVID-19 infection, it can also cause various postacute signs and symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate patients with postacute COVID-19 over 12 weeks of follow-up. The study included 151 patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time polymerase chain reaction of a nasopharyngeal swab 1 month earlier, had radiologic findings consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia, and presented to the post-COVID-19 outpatient clinic between May and August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups based on COVID-19 severity: nonsevere pneumonia (Group 1), severe pneumonia (Group 2), and severe pneumonia requiring intensive care (Group 3). Evaluation of laboratory parameters at 4 and 12 weeks showed that Group 3 had a higher lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) level and a lower mean platelet volume than the other groups at both time points (p = 0.001 for all). Group 3 also had lower percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), percent predicted forced expiration volume in 1 s (FEV1%), and percent predicted diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide divided by alveolar volume (DLCO/VA%) compared to Groups 1 and 2 at Week 4 (p = 0.001, 0.004, 0.001, respectively) and compared to Group 1 at 12 weeks (p = 0.002, 0.03, 0.001, respectively). Patients with persistent dyspnea at 12 weeks had significantly lower FEV1%, FVC%, DLCO/VA%, and saturation levels in room air and significantly higher LDH, pro-BNP, D-dimer, and heart rate compared to those without dyspnea (p = 0.001 for all). Although the lungs are most commonly affected after COVID-19 infection, vascular and endothelial damage also causes multisystem involvement. Our study indicates that laboratory values, radiological signs, and pulmonary functional capacity improved in most patients after 12 weeks of follow-up.

The relationship between NLRP3 rs10159239 and Vaspin rs2236242 gene variants and obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: In obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), recurrent upper airway obstruction and apnea/hypopnea episodes result in endothelial dysfunction, which leads to the release of many proinflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS induces NLRP3, a protein involved in the synthesis of interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-18; vaspin is a serine protease inhibitor that has an important role in suppressing the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of NLRP3 rs10159239 (rs9239) and vaspin rs2236242 (rs6242) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on OSA development. METHODS: This study included 220 individuals who underwent polysomnography (118 patients with OSA and 102 healthy controls). NLRP3 rs9239 and vaspin rs6242 mutation frequencies were analyzed. RESULTS: The NLRP3 rs9239 SNP genotype analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the OSA and control groups. In the vaspin gene analysis, the rs6242 AA genotype was significantly more frequent in the OSA group compared with the control group, while the AT genotype was more frequent in controls (P = 0.004, P = 0.02). Comparison of rs6242 allele levels showed that the A allele was significantly more frequent in OSA patients than in controls (P = 0.03). The AA genotype was significantly more frequent in patients with severe OSA than in patients with mild or moderate OSA and the control group (P = 0.001 for all). Serum vaspin levels were significantly lower in carriers of the AA genotype than those with AT and TT genotypes (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The vaspin rs6242 SNP AA genotype increased susceptibility to OSA, while the AT genotype appeared to be protective. The lower plasma vaspin levels in OSA compared with the control group and in patients with the AA genotype suggest that vaspin may be a protective biomarker for OSA.

Evaluation of the relationship between pentraxin 3 (PTX3) rs2305619 (281A/G) and rs1840680 (1449A/G) polymorphisms and the clinical course of COVID-19.

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the pentraxin 3 (PTX3) gene polymorphisms rs2305619 (281A/G) and rs1840680 (1449A/G) and the development of MAS in patients with COVID-19. The study included a total of 94 patients aged 18-45 who were diagnosed as having COVID-19 between June and December 2020. PTX3 281A/G and 1449A/G polymorphism frequencies were evaluated. PTX3 281A/G allele and genotype frequencies did not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg (HW) equilibrium in the MAS or non-MAS group (χ2 : 0.049, df: 2, p = 0.976, χ2 : 0.430, df: 2, p = 0.806). PTX3 1449A/G allele and genotype frequencies deviated significantly from HW equilibrium in the non-MAS group (χ2 : 6.794, df: 2, p = 0.033) but not in the MAS group (χ2 : 2.256, df: 2, p = 0.324). The AG genotype was significantly more frequent in the non-MAS group, while the AA genotype was significantly more frequent in the MAS group (χ2 : 11.099, df: 2, p= 0.004). Analysis of the PTX3 1449A/G polymorphism showed that individuals with the GG genotype had higher serum PTX3 levels than those with the AA and AG genotypes (p = 0.001 for both). Analysis of the PTX3 1449A/G polymorphism in patients with COVID-19 showed that those with the AG genotype were relatively more protected from MAS compared with individuals with the AA genotype. In addition, lower serum PTX3 levels are observed in patients carrying the A allele.

Is endogenous carboxyhaemoglobin level a useful biomarker of clinical course and prognosis in COVID-19 patients?

OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 has caused nearly 4 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide in the approximately 4 months since it emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Comorbidities increase morbidity and mortality in COVID-19, and many laboratory parameters have been associated with mortality. The aim of the present study was to identify the relationship between endogenous carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) level and the clinical course and prognosis of COVID-19. METHODS: The study included 48 non-smokers or ex-smokers aged 18 years or older who presented to the emergency department, were diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal swab sample and were treated in the pulmonary diseases ward of the Atatürk University hospital after 24 March 2020 and 15 April 2020. The patients' laboratory parameters and demographic data were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Prothrombin time and C-reactive protein (CRP), troponin-I, and D-dimer levels decreased in COVID-19 patients during follow-up (P = .024, P = .001, P = .001, P = .001), while PaO2 /FiO2 ratio and COHb increased (P = .002, P = .001). COHb level at admission was significantly lower in patients who developed macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and those who died compared with the other patients (P = .002, P = .001). COHb level on day 5 of treatment was significantly higher in patients with ARDS and patients who died (P = .001, P = .001). Significant correlations were detected between COHb level and CRP (r=-0.425, P = .001), ferritin (r = -.395, P = .001) and PaO2 /FiO2 ratio (r = .431, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: COHb level may be an easily accessible biomarker that guides early follow-up and treatment planning to avoid ARDS, MAS and mortality in COVID-19.

A 19-Year-Old-Woman With Backache, Hemoptysis, and Hypereosinophilia.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 19-year-old woman presented to our ED with complaints of backache and massive hemoptysis. Her medical history included acute dyspnea that developed within hours caused by angioneurotic edema 6 months earlier. Two days later, she was given thrombolytic treatment because of massive pulmonary thromboembolism. She had been given methylprednisolone 4 mg and tinzaparin sodium 0.7 mL subcutaneously and was still under treatment on the current admission. She had no history of smoking, alcohol, or oral contraceptive use, surgery, trauma, recent travel, clotting disorders, or familial diseases.

Association of plasma netrin-1 level with inflammatory balance and comorbidities in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common lung disease characterized by airflow restriction and systemic inflammation. Netrin-1 is a protein mainly produced in the central nervous system and has proven anti-inflammatory activity. The aim of this study was to determine netrin-1 level and its relationship with comorbidities in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 232 patients aged over 40 years who were divided into 3 groups: Group 1: ex-smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) with COPD hospitalized for COPD exacerbation (n= 142), Group 2: current-smokers (≥ 20 pack-years) without COPD (n= 30), Group 3: a control group comprising healthy non-smokers (n= 60). Plasma netrin-1 levels were measured using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. RESULT: There were significant differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma netrin-1 levels between patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and current smokers without COPD, healthy controls (p= 0.001 for all). Netrin-1 levels at discharge were lower in COPD patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) compared to nondiabetic COPD patients (p= 0.01). Weak correlation was observed between netrin-1 level at admission and FEV1, FVC, partial pressure of oxygen, and CRP levels (r= 0.394, p= 0.01; r= -0.366, p= 0.01; r= -0.19, p= 0.05; r= 0.306, p= 0.01). Netrin-1 level at admission was also moderately correlated with smoking history (pack-years) (r= 0.579, p= 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Netrin-1 was elevated in acute exacerbation of COPD and may be an important element in inflammatory balance. Patients with both COPD and DM were found to have lower netrin-1 levels at discharge after resolution of the acute exacerbation.